![]() If it really was the first to do certain tasks, then I would at least expect some independent (and reliable) reviews of the application? " first tagger available that could perform acoustic fingerprint matching automatically without user intervention" But what does it do if the confidence in a fingerprint lookup is low? What does it do if the fingerprint has several matches? I have used the MusicBrainz (classic) Tagger way back, and it certainly did tag files automatically if its confidence was good enough. contribs) Well, per the notability guideline, if no published, third party, reliable sources on the subject cannot be produced then the subject is not notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia entry.Preceding unsigned comment added by Pault100 ( talk PicardQt and Jaikoz are the ONLY taggers that match against MusicIP and MusicBrainz. Well this is a statement of fact, there are very few tag editors that support online matching based on the acoustic id, the vast majority only support metadata match from freedb or Gracenote, a few support MusicIP but not many. ![]() The majority of taggers only provide a metadata lookup and, because of the inaccuracy of this method, requires the user to confirm modifications. This was done on the 2nd of June 2005 ( see ), the musicbrainz tagger would perform acoustic matching before that but it wasn't fully automated, as a user you still had to decide which matches to accept,Ģ. Jaikoz was the first tagger available that could perform acoustic fingerprint matching automatically without user intervention. ![]() Has a number of unique features that merit it having a page.ġ. If you want to rewrite the text that is not a problem, but I believe Jaikoz Concerns raised that citations are required for the following assertions, the text was written this way because of previous concerns about the uniqueness of Jaikoz, I believe these assertions to be true and have added more information below but I do not have independent definitive proof. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |